#Ira glass this american life how to

That last episode won a Pulitzer and is an example of how the show – to my mind – has become more political over the past five years, while staying true to its original mission of focusing on people’s stories.

Typical This American Life episodes include 24 hours in a diner, in which the reporters chat with the patrons who come in, or interviewing asylum seekers in a refugee camp in Mexico, as they wait to hear if they can get into the US.

#Ira glass this american life how to

Although when I say that to him, he says with mock-but-actually-a-bit-real outrage that Martin has a podcast in his new TV show, Only Murders in the Building: “He does the sound all wrong! It’s a crime! People on that show should know how to place a microphone!” If podcasting is to the 2020s what standup comedy was to the 1970s, Glass is podcasting’s Steve Martin, the man who showed how big it could be. It now gets more than 4 million listeners every week and is widely credited with starting the podcast revolution. Not rich people, not famous ones, not beautiful ones just people.

He started it in the mid-90s with the objective to tell stories – through interviews and narrative – about normal people. … Just because you can’t find any more meat on my bones in this matter doesn’t allow you the right to hunt someone else.Glass, who has the nasal voice and nerdily handsome looks of an attractive suburban maths teacher, is the founder and host of the long-running radio show and podcast This American Life. In the post, Daisey calls Farhi “Eric Farhi.” Daisey says his deeds are “not an excuse for media watchdogs to clamp down as though they are protecting the public from stories as though they need their food chewed for them. “This American Life” retracted a Daisey story about Apple’s manufacturing practices after it learned he had fabricated parts of the story. No one cares what is factually accurate in the details of what his aunt said to him in his childhood, except maybe his family members, and they should be fucking used to it by now. Sedaris’ feelings about the pleasures of smoking, or cutlery, or whatever the fuck it is that David is talking about. No one is listening to SANTALAND DIARIES and then saying to themselves, “I am now informed about the true nature of Macy’s elf policies from the early nineties, which is good as I am writing a PhD thesis on that very subject.” No one is calling NPR complaining that they were terribly tricked by Mr. In a fiery blog post, Mike Daisey says the discussion is ridiculous:įirst, no-one is upset with Mr. “I do think some kind of flag or label or introduction would be appropriate.” “When you have so much questioning of what’s real, fair, subjective and accurate in the news media, it doesn’t help to have on a news program that gives no indication that some liberties have been taken,” said Edward Schumacher-Matos, NPR’s ombudsman, its independent in-house critic. Labeling Sedaris’ stories appeals to some at NPR, Farhi reports: The New Yorker magazine subjects Sedaris’s work to its rigorous fact-checking regime before it publishes his stories. Glass said three responses are under discussion: fact-checking each of Sedaris’s stories to ensure their accuracy, labeling them to alert the audience that the stories contain “exaggerations” or doing nothing.Īt the moment, Glass said, he thinks the best course is to check Sedaris’s facts to the extent that stories involving memories and long-ago conversations can be checked. “We just assumed the audience was sophisticated enough to tell that this guy is making jokes and that there was a different level of journalistic scrutiny that we and they should apply,” he said.īut the Daisey debacle has brought about a reassessment.

In an interview, Glass said no one at his program was concerned about Sedaris before the Daisey episode.

“This American Life” is considering fact-checking David Sedaris’ work for the program, Paul Farhi reports: